Editorial Type:
Diagnostic Imaging

Dynamic computed tomographic quantitation of hepatic perfusion in dogs with and without portal vascular anomalies

Allison L. Zwingenberger Department of Clinical Studies, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 19104-6010.

Search for other papers by Allison L. Zwingenberger in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
 DVM
and
Frances S. Shofer Department of Clinical Studies, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 19104-6010.

Search for other papers by Frances S. Shofer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
 PhD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.68.9.970
Volume/Issue:
Volume 68: Issue 9
Online Publication Date:
01 Sep 2007
Restricted access
Sign In Reprints and Permissions Purchase Article

Abstract

Objective—To compare hepatic, pancreatic, and gastric perfusion on dynamic computed tomography (CT) scans of clinically normal dogs with those of dogs with portal vascular anomalies.

Sample Population—Dynamic computed tomography (CT) scans of 10 clinically normal dogs and 21 dogs with portal vascular anomalies.

Procedures—Retrospective analysis of dynamic CT scans. Hepatic arterial perfusion, hepatic portal perfusion, total hepatic perfusion, hepatic perfusion index, gastric perfusion, and pancreatic perfusion were calculated from time attenuation curves.

Results—Mean ± hepatic arterial perfusion was significantly higher in affected dogs (0.57 ± 0.27 mL/min•mL−1) than in clinically normal dogs (0.23 ± 0.11 mL/min•mL−1), and hepatic portal perfusion was significantly lower in affected dogs (0.52 ± 0.47 mL/min•mL−1) than in clinically normal dogs (1.08 ± 0.45 mL/min•mL−1). This was reflected in the hepatic perfusion index, which was significantly higher in affected dogs (0.59 ± 0.34), compared with clinically normal dogs (0.19 ± 0.07). Gastric perfusion was significantly higher in dogs with portal vascular anomalies (0.72 ± 0.44 mL/min•mL−1) than in clinically normal dogs (0.41 ± 0.21 mL/min•mL−1), but total hepatic perfusion and pancreatic perfusion were not significantly different. Among subgroups, dogs with congenital intrahepatic portosystemic shunts and dogs with arterioportal fistulae had higher hepatic arterial perfusion than did clinically normal dogs. Dogs with congenital intrahepatic portosystemic shunts also had an increase in gastric perfusion and hepatic perfusion index.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Hepatic perfusion variables measured on CT scans revealed differences in hemodynamics between clinically normal dogs and those with portal vascular anomalies.

Abstract

Objective—To compare hepatic, pancreatic, and gastric perfusion on dynamic computed tomography (CT) scans of clinically normal dogs with those of dogs with portal vascular anomalies.

Sample Population—Dynamic computed tomography (CT) scans of 10 clinically normal dogs and 21 dogs with portal vascular anomalies.

Procedures—Retrospective analysis of dynamic CT scans. Hepatic arterial perfusion, hepatic portal perfusion, total hepatic perfusion, hepatic perfusion index, gastric perfusion, and pancreatic perfusion were calculated from time attenuation curves.

Results—Mean ± hepatic arterial perfusion was significantly higher in affected dogs (0.57 ± 0.27 mL/min•mL−1) than in clinically normal dogs (0.23 ± 0.11 mL/min•mL−1), and hepatic portal perfusion was significantly lower in affected dogs (0.52 ± 0.47 mL/min•mL−1) than in clinically normal dogs (1.08 ± 0.45 mL/min•mL−1). This was reflected in the hepatic perfusion index, which was significantly higher in affected dogs (0.59 ± 0.34), compared with clinically normal dogs (0.19 ± 0.07). Gastric perfusion was significantly higher in dogs with portal vascular anomalies (0.72 ± 0.44 mL/min•mL−1) than in clinically normal dogs (0.41 ± 0.21 mL/min•mL−1), but total hepatic perfusion and pancreatic perfusion were not significantly different. Among subgroups, dogs with congenital intrahepatic portosystemic shunts and dogs with arterioportal fistulae had higher hepatic arterial perfusion than did clinically normal dogs. Dogs with congenital intrahepatic portosystemic shunts also had an increase in gastric perfusion and hepatic perfusion index.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Hepatic perfusion variables measured on CT scans revealed differences in hemodynamics between clinically normal dogs and those with portal vascular anomalies.

Contributor Notes

Dr. Zwingenberger's present address is Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616

Presented in abstract form at the International Veterinary Radiology Association Meeting, Vancouver, BC, Canada, August 2006.

Address correspondence to Dr. Zwingenberger.
Cover American Journal of Veterinary Research
American Journal of Veterinary Research
Publication Date:
01 Sep 2007
  • 1.

    Skerritt GC, Jenkins SA. Some biochemical and physiological data of the Labrador Retriever. J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med 1986;33:93–98.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Kotzampassi K, Koufogiannis D, Farmakis H, et al. Long-term measurement of liver microcirculation in dogs and humans. Dig Surg 1998;15:357–363.

  • 3.

    Jaschke W, Lipton MJ, Boyd D, et al. Dynamic CT scanning of the normal canine liver: interpretation of time density curves resulting from an intravenous bolus injection of contrast material. Eur J Radiol 1985;5:256–260.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Kantrowitz BM, Nyland TG, Fisher P. Estimation of portal blood flow using duplex real-time and pulsed Doppler ultrasound imaging in the dog. Vet Radiol 1989;30:222–226.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Koblik PD, Hornof WJ, Breznock EM. Quantitative hepatic scintigraphy in the dog. Vet Radiol 1983;24:226–231.

  • 6.

    Mathie RT. Hepatic blood flow measurement with inert gas clearance. J Surg Res 1986;41:92–110.

  • 7.

    Koblik PD, Hornof WJ, Breznock EM. Use of quantitative hepatic scintigraphy to evaluate spontaneous portosystemic shunts in 12 dogs. Vet Radiol 1983;24:232–235.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Shatney CH, Harmon JW, Rich NM. Effects of portosystemic shunting on visceral and portal blood flow in the dog. Gastroenterology 1982;83:1170–1176.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Gurll NJ, Reynolds DG, Coon D, et al. Acute and chronic splanchnic blood flow responses to portacaval shunt in the normal dog. Gastroenterology 1980;78:1432–1436.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Shikare SV, Bashir K, Abraham P, et al. Hepatic perfusion index in portal hypertension of cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic aetiologies. Nucl Med Commun 1996;17:520–522.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Mathie RT, Blumgart LH. The hepatic haemodynamic response to acute portal venous blood flow reductions in the dog. Pflugers Arch 1983;399:223–227.

  • 12.

    Blomley MJ, Coulden R, Dawson P, et al. Liver perfusion studied with ultrafast CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1995;19:424–433.

  • 13.

    Blomley MJ, Coulden R, Bufkin C, et al. Contrast bolus dynamic computed tomography for the measurement of solid organ perfusion. Invest Radiol 1993;28 (suppl 5):S72–S78.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Koranda P, Myslivecek M, Erban J, et al. Hepatic perfusion changes in patients with cirrhosis indices of hepatic arterial blood flow. Clin Nucl Med 1999;24:507–510.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Tsushima Y, Blomley MJK, Kusano S, et al. Measuring portal venous perfusion with contrast-enhanced CT: comparison of direct and indirect methods. Acad Radiol 2002;9:276–282.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Riesen S, Schmid V, Gaschen L, et al. Doppler measurement of splanchnic blood flow during digestion in unsedated normal dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2002;43:554–560.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Koblik PD, Komtebedde J, Yen CK, et al. Use of transcolonic 99mtechnetium-pertechnetate as a screening test for portosystemic shunts in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1990;196:925–930.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Meyer HP, Rothuizen J, vanSluijs FJ, et al. Progressive remission of portosystemic shunting in 23 dogs after partial closure of congenital portosystemic shunts. Vet Rec 1999;144:333–337.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Van Vechten BJ, Komtebedde J, Koblik PD. Use of transcolonic portal scintigraphy to monitor blood flow and progressive postoperative attenuation of partially ligated single extrahepatic portosystemic shunts in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1994;204:1770–1774.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Samii VF, Kyles AE, Long CD, et al. Evaluation of interoperator variance in shunt fraction calculation after transcolonic scintigraphy for diagnosis of portosystemic shunts in dogs and cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001;218:1116–1119.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement