Influence of three anesthetic protocols on glomerular filtration rate in dogs

Marion Fusellier Animal Pathophysiology and Functional Pharmacology Unit (UPSP 5304), National Veterinary School, BP 40706, F-44307 Nantes, France.

Search for other papers by Marion Fusellier in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Jean-Claude Desfontis Animal Pathophysiology and Functional Pharmacology Unit (UPSP 5304), National Veterinary School, BP 40706, F-44307 Nantes, France.

Search for other papers by Jean-Claude Desfontis in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Stéphane Madec Animal Pathophysiology and Functional Pharmacology Unit (UPSP 5304), National Veterinary School, BP 40706, F-44307 Nantes, France.

Search for other papers by Stéphane Madec in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Freddy Gautier Animal Pathophysiology and Functional Pharmacology Unit (UPSP 5304), National Veterinary School, BP 40706, F-44307 Nantes, France.

Search for other papers by Freddy Gautier in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Michelle Debailleul Animal Pathophysiology and Functional Pharmacology Unit (UPSP 5304), National Veterinary School, BP 40706, F-44307 Nantes, France.

Search for other papers by Michelle Debailleul in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Marc Gogny Animal Pathophysiology and Functional Pharmacology Unit (UPSP 5304), National Veterinary School, BP 40706, F-44307 Nantes, France.

Search for other papers by Marc Gogny in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM

Abstract

Objective—To investigate renal function in clinically normal dogs when awake and during anesthesia with medetomidine; xylazine, ketamine, and halothane (XKH) combination; or propofol.

Animals—10 adult female Beagles.

Procedures—At intervals of 15 days, dogs were administered medetomidine (0.05 mg/kg, IV); XKH combination (xylazine [1 mg/kg, IV], ketamine [5 mg/kg, IV], and halothane [1% end-tidal concentration]); or propofol (6 mg/kg, IV) to induce anesthesia or no treatment. Glomerular filtration rate was assessed on the basis of renal uptake (RU; determined via renal scintigraphy) and plasma clearance (CL) of technetium 99m-labeled diethylenetriamine peentaacetic acid (99mTc-DTPA).

Results—In awake dogs, mean ± SEM RU was 9.7 ± 0.4% and CL was 3.86 ± 0.23 mL/min/ kg. Renal uptake and CL of 99mTc-DTPA were not significantly modified by administration of XKH (RU, 11.4 ± 0.9%; CL, 4.6 ± 0.32 mL/min/kg) or propofol (RU, 9.7 ± 0.3%; CL, 3.78 ± 0.37 mL/min/kg). Half-life elimination time of plasma 99mTc-DTPA decreased significantly in XKH-anesthetized dogs, compared with the value in awake dogs (14.4 minutes and 28.9 minutes, respectively). However, glomerular filtration rate was significantly decreased by administration of medetomidine (RU, 3.9 ± 0.1%), and the time to maximum kidney activity was significantly increased (867 ± 56 seconds vs 181 ± 11 seconds without anesthesia).

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results indicated that anesthesia with propofol or an XKH combination did not alter renal function in healthy Beagles, but anesthesia with medetomidine decreased early RU of 99mTc-DTPA.

Abstract

Objective—To investigate renal function in clinically normal dogs when awake and during anesthesia with medetomidine; xylazine, ketamine, and halothane (XKH) combination; or propofol.

Animals—10 adult female Beagles.

Procedures—At intervals of 15 days, dogs were administered medetomidine (0.05 mg/kg, IV); XKH combination (xylazine [1 mg/kg, IV], ketamine [5 mg/kg, IV], and halothane [1% end-tidal concentration]); or propofol (6 mg/kg, IV) to induce anesthesia or no treatment. Glomerular filtration rate was assessed on the basis of renal uptake (RU; determined via renal scintigraphy) and plasma clearance (CL) of technetium 99m-labeled diethylenetriamine peentaacetic acid (99mTc-DTPA).

Results—In awake dogs, mean ± SEM RU was 9.7 ± 0.4% and CL was 3.86 ± 0.23 mL/min/ kg. Renal uptake and CL of 99mTc-DTPA were not significantly modified by administration of XKH (RU, 11.4 ± 0.9%; CL, 4.6 ± 0.32 mL/min/kg) or propofol (RU, 9.7 ± 0.3%; CL, 3.78 ± 0.37 mL/min/kg). Half-life elimination time of plasma 99mTc-DTPA decreased significantly in XKH-anesthetized dogs, compared with the value in awake dogs (14.4 minutes and 28.9 minutes, respectively). However, glomerular filtration rate was significantly decreased by administration of medetomidine (RU, 3.9 ± 0.1%), and the time to maximum kidney activity was significantly increased (867 ± 56 seconds vs 181 ± 11 seconds without anesthesia).

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results indicated that anesthesia with propofol or an XKH combination did not alter renal function in healthy Beagles, but anesthesia with medetomidine decreased early RU of 99mTc-DTPA.

Contributor Notes

Presented in part at the 5th European Society of Laboratory Animal Veterinarians Congress, Nantes, France, June 2004.

The authors thank Françoise Coppin for radiopharmaceutical titration and Chantal Thorin for data and statistical analyses.

Address correspondence to Dr. Desfontis.
  • 1

    Heller J, Horacek V. Kidney function during decreased perfusion pressure due to aortic clamping and hemorrhagic hypotension: a single nephron study in dog kidney. Ren Physiol 1984;7:90101.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Finco DR, Brown SA, Brown CA, et al. Progression of chronic renal disease in the dog. J Vet Intern Med 1999;13:516528.

  • 3

    Krawiec DR, Badertscher RR, Twardock AR, et al. Evaluation of 99mTc-diethylene-triaminepentacetic acid nuclear imaging for quantitative determination of the glomerular filtration rate of dogs. Am J Vet Res 1986;47:21752179.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Hornof WJ, Cowgill LD, Conrad GR, et al. Semiautomated renal region-of-interest selection method: validation in a dog model. Am J Physiol Imagaging 1988;3:133138.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Barthez PY, Hornof WJ, Cowgill LD, et al. Comparison between the scintigraphic uptake and plasma clearance of 99 mTc-diethylenetriaminepentacetic acid (DTPA) for the evaluation of the glomerular filtration rate in dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1998;39:470474.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Vainio O, Palmu L. Cardiovascular and respiratory effects of medetomidine in dogs and influence of anticholinergics. Acta Vet Scand 1989;30:401408.

  • 7

    Haskins SC. Injectable anesthetics. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1992;22:245260.

  • 8

    Krawiec DR, Twardock AR, Bardertscher RR, et al. Use of 99mTc-diethylene-triaminepentacetic acid for assessment of renal function in dogs with suspected renal disease. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1988;192:10771080.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Itoh K. Comparison of methods for determination of glomerular filtration rate: Tc-99m-DTPA renography, predicted creatinine clearance method and plasma sample method. Ann Nucl Med 2003;17:561565.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Fusellier M, Desfontis J-C, Madec S, et al. Effect of tepoxalin on renal function in healthy dogs receiving an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2005;28:581586.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Mitchell S, Toal R, Daniel G, et al. Evaluation of renal hemodynamics in awake and isoflurane-anesthetized cats with pulsed-wave Doppler and quantitative renal scintigraphy. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1998;39:451458.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Bostrom I, Nyman G, Kampa N, et al. Effects of acepromazine on renal function in anesthetized dogs. Am J Vet Res 2003;64:590598.

  • 13

    Sinclair MD. A review of the physiological effects of alpha2-agonists related to the clinical use of medetomidine in small animal practice. Can Vet J 2003;44:885896.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Paddleford R, Harvey R. Alpha2 agonists and antagonists. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1999;29:737745.

  • 15

    Thurmon J, Benson G. Pharmacologic consideration in selection of anaesthetics for animals. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1987;191:12451251.

  • 16

    Short C, Bufalari A. Propofol anesthesia. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1999;29:747778.

  • 17

    Murrel JC, Hellebrekers LJ. Medetomidine and dexmedetomidine: a review of cardiovascular effects and antinociceptive properties in the dog. Vet Anaesth Analg 2005;32:117127.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Saleh N, Aoki M, Shimada T, et al. Renal effects of medetomidine in isoflurane-anesthetized dogs with special reference to its diuretic action. J Vet Med Sci 2005;67:461465.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Pypendop BH, Verstegen JP. Hemodynamic effects of medetomidine in the dog: a dose titration study. Vet Surg 1998;27:612622.

  • 20

    Grimm JB, Grimm KA, Kneller SK, et al. The effect of combination of medetomidine-butorphanol and medetomidine, butorphanol, atropine on glomerular filtration rate in dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2001;42:458462.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement