Validation of two-dimensional kinematic analysis of walk and sit-to-stand motions in dogs

Lauren C. Feeney Comparative Orthopedics Laboratory, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606

Search for other papers by Lauren C. Feeney in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Cheng-Feng Lin Center for Human Movement Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599

Search for other papers by Cheng-Feng Lin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
,
Denis J. Marcellin-Little Comparative Orthopedics Laboratory, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606

Search for other papers by Denis J. Marcellin-Little in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DEDV
,
Amanda R. Tate Animal Rehabilitation and Wellness Hospital, 700-107 Blue Ridge Rd, Raleigh, NC 27606

Search for other papers by Amanda R. Tate in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BSPT
,
Robin M. Queen Center for Human Movement Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599

Search for other papers by Robin M. Queen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
, and
Bing Yu Center for Human Movement Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599

Search for other papers by Bing Yu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD

Abstract

Objective—To assess the intra- and interobserver repeatability of 2-dimensional (2-D) kinematic analysis of walk and sit-to-stand motions in dogs.

Animals—10 healthy adult Labrador Retrievers.

Procedures—10 dogs were filmed during walk and sit-to-stand motions. Five trials were recorded for each dog, 3 of which were digitized. Two observers manually marked 15 landmarks on each frame during the motions of interest for these 3 trials. Each observer repeated the procedure approximately 1 week later. The 2-D joint angles were calculated. Intra- and interobserver coefficients of multiple correlations (CMCs) were calculated for each joint angle–time history.

Results—Intraobserver repeatability, assessed as the mean CMCs of 12 joint angle measurements made for 10 dogs by 2 observers, was good or excellent in 23 of 24 (96%) mean CMCs of the joints measured. Interobserver variation, assessed by comparing CMCs of measurements made by 2 observers on 10 dogs on 2 days, was good or excellent in 161 of 240 (67%) CMCs of joints measured.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Intraobserver repeatability of 2-D kinematic measurements made on digitized videotapes was excellent. Interobserver repeatability of these measurements was acceptable.

Abstract

Objective—To assess the intra- and interobserver repeatability of 2-dimensional (2-D) kinematic analysis of walk and sit-to-stand motions in dogs.

Animals—10 healthy adult Labrador Retrievers.

Procedures—10 dogs were filmed during walk and sit-to-stand motions. Five trials were recorded for each dog, 3 of which were digitized. Two observers manually marked 15 landmarks on each frame during the motions of interest for these 3 trials. Each observer repeated the procedure approximately 1 week later. The 2-D joint angles were calculated. Intra- and interobserver coefficients of multiple correlations (CMCs) were calculated for each joint angle–time history.

Results—Intraobserver repeatability, assessed as the mean CMCs of 12 joint angle measurements made for 10 dogs by 2 observers, was good or excellent in 23 of 24 (96%) mean CMCs of the joints measured. Interobserver variation, assessed by comparing CMCs of measurements made by 2 observers on 10 dogs on 2 days, was good or excellent in 161 of 240 (67%) CMCs of joints measured.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Intraobserver repeatability of 2-D kinematic measurements made on digitized videotapes was excellent. Interobserver repeatability of these measurements was acceptable.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 199 0 0
Full Text Views 6775 6117 4952
PDF Downloads 969 460 35
Advertisement