Determination and use of mechanical nociceptive thresholds of the thoracic limb to assess pain associated with induced osteoarthritis of the middle carpal joint in horses

Kevin K. Haussler Gail Holmes Equine Orthopaedic Research Center, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.

Search for other papers by Kevin K. Haussler in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, DC, PhD
,
Ashley E. Hill Animal Population Health Institute, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.

Search for other papers by Ashley E. Hill in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MPVM, PhD
,
David D. Frisbie Gail Holmes Equine Orthopaedic Research Center, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.

Search for other papers by David D. Frisbie in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
, and
C. Wayne McIlwraith Gail Holmes Equine Orthopaedic Research Center, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.

Search for other papers by C. Wayne McIlwraith in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVSc, PhD

Abstract

Objectives—To establish reference mechanical nociceptive threshold (MNT) values of the equine thoracic limb and to assess the use of MNT values to detect pain associated with induced osteoarthritis in the middle carpal joint.

Animals—24 adult horses.

Procedures—MNT values were evoked by a pressure algometer at 17 sites within each thoracic limb during 2 baseline sessions conducted an average of 5 days apart. Effects of age, sex, weight, and wither height on MNT values were assessed separately for each site. Tolerance of horses to the procedure was graded subjectively and correlated with MNT values. Synovitis and osteoarthritis were induced arthroscopically in the middle carpal joint of 1 randomly selected thoracic limb. The opposite limb served as a sham-operated control limb. Mechanical nociceptive threshold values were recorded weekly and correlated with clinical, radiographic, and necropsy scores measured over 10 weeks. Lower MNT values corresponded with increased pain, whereas higher MNT values indicated reduced pain.

Results—A gradual increase in MNT values was detected from proximal-to-distal sites of the thoracic limbs. High MNT values were recorded for geldings and tall horses. In general, tolerance to procedure scores was positively correlated with overall pooled MNT values within each thoracic limb. From 2 to 6 weeks after surgery, the osteoarthritic limb had significantly reduced MNT values within the carpal region. The osteoarthritic limb also had significant changes in clinical examination, radiographic, and necropsy scores, which were poorly correlated with MNT values.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Pressure algometry provided objective assessment of nociception of the thoracic limb; however, MNT values were poorly correlated with clinical variables used to assess osteoarthritis.

Abstract

Objectives—To establish reference mechanical nociceptive threshold (MNT) values of the equine thoracic limb and to assess the use of MNT values to detect pain associated with induced osteoarthritis in the middle carpal joint.

Animals—24 adult horses.

Procedures—MNT values were evoked by a pressure algometer at 17 sites within each thoracic limb during 2 baseline sessions conducted an average of 5 days apart. Effects of age, sex, weight, and wither height on MNT values were assessed separately for each site. Tolerance of horses to the procedure was graded subjectively and correlated with MNT values. Synovitis and osteoarthritis were induced arthroscopically in the middle carpal joint of 1 randomly selected thoracic limb. The opposite limb served as a sham-operated control limb. Mechanical nociceptive threshold values were recorded weekly and correlated with clinical, radiographic, and necropsy scores measured over 10 weeks. Lower MNT values corresponded with increased pain, whereas higher MNT values indicated reduced pain.

Results—A gradual increase in MNT values was detected from proximal-to-distal sites of the thoracic limbs. High MNT values were recorded for geldings and tall horses. In general, tolerance to procedure scores was positively correlated with overall pooled MNT values within each thoracic limb. From 2 to 6 weeks after surgery, the osteoarthritic limb had significantly reduced MNT values within the carpal region. The osteoarthritic limb also had significant changes in clinical examination, radiographic, and necropsy scores, which were poorly correlated with MNT values.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Pressure algometry provided objective assessment of nociception of the thoracic limb; however, MNT values were poorly correlated with clinical variables used to assess osteoarthritis.

Contributor Notes

Supported in part by the Equine Orthopaedic Research Discretionary Funds, Colorado State University Foundation.

The authors thank Drs. Chris Kawcak and Natasha Werpy for technical assistance.

Address correspondence to Dr. Haussler.
  • 1.

    Ishihara A, Bertone AL, Rajala-Schultz PJ. Association between subjective lameness grade and kinetic gait parameters in horses with experimentally induced forelimb lameness. Am J Vet Res 2005;66:18051815.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Kelmer G, Keegan KG, Kramer J, et al. Computer-assisted kinematic evaluation of induced compensatory movements resembling lameness in horses trotting on a treadmill. Am J Vet Res 2005;66:646655.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Chambers JP, Waterman AE, Livingston A. Further development of equipment to measure nociceptive thresholds in large animals. J Vet Anesth 1994;21:6672.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Fischer AA. Pressure algometry over normal muscles: standard values, validity and reproducibility of pressure threshold. Pain 1987;30:115126.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Kosek E, Ekholm J, Hansson P. Modulation of pressure pain thresholds during and following isometric contraction in patients with fibromyalgia and in healthy controls. Pain 1996;64:415423.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Lascelles BD, Cripps PJ, Jones A, et al. Post-operative central hypersensitivity and pain: the pre-emptive value of pethidine for ovariohysterectomy. Pain 1997;73:461471.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Kosek E, Ekholm J, Nordemar R. A comparison of pressure pain thresholds in different tissues and body regions. Long-term reliability of pressure algometry in healthy volunteers. Scand J Rehabil Med 1993;25:117124.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Haussler KK, Erb HN. Mechanical nociceptive thresholds in the axial skeleton of horses. Equine Vet J 2006;38:7075.

  • 9.

    Brennum J, Kjeldsen M, Jensen K, et al. Measurements of human pressure-pain thresholds on fingers and toes. Pain 1989;38:211217.

  • 10.

    Chesterton LS, Barlas P, Foster NE, et al. Gender differences in pressure pain threshold in healthy humans. Pain 2003;101:259266.

  • 11.

    Zahorska-Markiewicz B, Zych P, Kucio C. Pain sensitivity in obesity. Acta Physiol Pol 1988;39:183187.

  • 12.

    Frisbie DD, Kawcak CE, Trotter GW, et al. Effects of triamcinolone acetonide on an in vivo equine osteochondral fragment exercise model. Equine Vet J 1997;29:349359.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Wessel J. The reliability and validity of pain threshold measurements in osteoarthritis of the knee. Scand J Rheumatol 1995;24:238242.

  • 14.

    Wright A, Robins L, McGuire B. Pressure and thermal pain thresholds in the forequarter: normative data. J Musculoskeletal Pain 1995;3:91103.

  • 15.

    Tunks E, McCain GA, Hart LE, et al. The reliability of examination for tenderness in patients with myofascial pain, chronic fibromyalgia and controls. J Rheumatol 1995;22:944952.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Keating L, Lubke C, Powell V, et al. Mid-thoracic tenderness: a comparison of pressure pain threshold between spinal regions, in asymptomatic subjects. Man Ther 2001;6:3439.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Vanderweeën L, Oostendorp RA, Vaes P, et al. Pressure algometry in manual therapy. Man Ther 1996;1:258265.

  • 18.

    Rollman GB, Lautenbacher S. Sex differences in musculoskeletal pain. Clin J Pain 2001;17:2024.

  • 19.

    Ohrbach R, Gale EN. Pressure pain thresholds in normal muscles: reliability, measurement effects, and topographic differences. Pain 1989;37:257263.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Pauli P, Wiedemann G, Nickola M. Pressure pain thresholds asymmetry in left- and right-handers: associations with behavioural measures of cerebral laterality. Eur J Pain 1999;3:151156.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    List T, Helkimo M, Karlsson R. Influence of pressure rates on the reliability of a pressure threshold meter. J Craniomandib Disord 1991;5:173178.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Antonaci F, Sand T, Lucas GA. Pressure algometry in healthy subjects: inter-examiner variability. Scand J Rehabil Med 1998;30:38.

  • 23.

    Nussbaum EL, Downes L. Reliability of clinical pressure-pain algometric measurements obtained on consecutive days. Phys Ther 1998;78:160169.

  • 24.

    Kidd BL, Photiou A, Inglis JJ. The role of inflammatory mediators on nociception and pain in arthritis. Novartis Found Symp 2004;260:122133.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Treede RD, Rolke R, Andrews K, et al. Pain elicited by blunt pressure: neurobiological basis and clinical relevance. Pain 2002;98:235240.

  • 26.

    Haussler KK, Erb HN. Pressure algometry for the detection of induced back pain in horses: a preliminary study. Equine Vet J 2006;38:7681.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Busschers E, van Weeren PR. Use of the flexion test of the distal forelimb in the sound horse: repeatability and effect of age, gender, weight, height and fetlock joint range of motion. J Vet Med 2001;48:413427.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Ley SJ, Waterman AE, Livingston A. A field study of the effect of lameness on mechanical nociceptive thresholds in sheep. Vet Rec 1995;137:8587.

  • 29.

    Kosek E, Ordeberg G. Lack of pressure pain modulation by heterotopic noxious conditioning stimulation in patients with painful osteoarthritis before, but not following, surgical pain relief. Pain 2000;88:6978.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement