Evaluation of the urodynamic and hemodynamic effects of orally administered phenylpropanolamine and ephedrine in female dogs

Francesca Carofiglio Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Belgium.

Search for other papers by Francesca Carofiglio in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Annick J. Hamaide Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Belgium.

Search for other papers by Annick J. Hamaide in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Frédéric Farnir Department of Animal Production, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Belgium.

Search for other papers by Frédéric Farnir in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Marc H. Balligand Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Belgium.

Search for other papers by Marc H. Balligand in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
, and
John P. Verstegen Department of Companion Animal Reproduction, Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville FL 32610-0136.

Search for other papers by John P. Verstegen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD

Abstract

Objective—To compare the urodynamic and hemodynamic effects of different dosages of phenylpropanolamine and ephedrine and determine effective dosages in increasing urethral resistance in female dogs.

Animals—20 sexually intact female Beagles.

Procedure—Dogs were allocated into 4 groups and received phenylpropanolamine once, twice, or 3 times daily, or ephedrine twice daily, for 14 days. On days 0, 7, and 14, urethral pressure profiles were performed while dogs were anesthetized with propofol. Variables recorded included maximum urethral pressure, maximum urethral closure pressure, integrated pressure, functional profile length, anatomic profile length, plateau distance, distance before maximum urethral pressure, and maximum meatus pressure. Arterial and central venous pressures were measured before anesthetic induction and 10 and 35 minutes after induction.

Results—Administration of phenylpropanolamine once daily or ephedrine twice daily significantly increased maximum urethral pressure and maximum urethral closure pressure. Values for integrated pressure were significantly increased after 14 days of once-daily administration of phenylpropanolamine. Variables did not change significantly from day 7 to day 14. Diastolic and mean arterial blood pressures increased significantly during the treatment periods, and arterial pressure decreased during propofol infusion.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Oral administration of phenylpropanolamine once daily or ephedrine twice daily increased urethral resistance in clinically normal dogs and may be recommended for management of urethral sphincter mechanism incompetence. Treatment efficacy may be assessed after 1 week. Dogs with concurrent cardiovascular disease should be monitored for blood pressure while receiving α-adrenergic agents because of the effects on diastolic and mean arterial pressure.

Abstract

Objective—To compare the urodynamic and hemodynamic effects of different dosages of phenylpropanolamine and ephedrine and determine effective dosages in increasing urethral resistance in female dogs.

Animals—20 sexually intact female Beagles.

Procedure—Dogs were allocated into 4 groups and received phenylpropanolamine once, twice, or 3 times daily, or ephedrine twice daily, for 14 days. On days 0, 7, and 14, urethral pressure profiles were performed while dogs were anesthetized with propofol. Variables recorded included maximum urethral pressure, maximum urethral closure pressure, integrated pressure, functional profile length, anatomic profile length, plateau distance, distance before maximum urethral pressure, and maximum meatus pressure. Arterial and central venous pressures were measured before anesthetic induction and 10 and 35 minutes after induction.

Results—Administration of phenylpropanolamine once daily or ephedrine twice daily significantly increased maximum urethral pressure and maximum urethral closure pressure. Values for integrated pressure were significantly increased after 14 days of once-daily administration of phenylpropanolamine. Variables did not change significantly from day 7 to day 14. Diastolic and mean arterial blood pressures increased significantly during the treatment periods, and arterial pressure decreased during propofol infusion.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Oral administration of phenylpropanolamine once daily or ephedrine twice daily increased urethral resistance in clinically normal dogs and may be recommended for management of urethral sphincter mechanism incompetence. Treatment efficacy may be assessed after 1 week. Dogs with concurrent cardiovascular disease should be monitored for blood pressure while receiving α-adrenergic agents because of the effects on diastolic and mean arterial pressure.

Contributor Notes

Dr. Hamaide.
  • 1

    Holt PE. Urinary incontinence in the bitch due to sphincter mechanism incompetence: prevalence in referred dogs and retrospective analysis of 60 cases. J Small Anim Pract 1985; 26: 181190.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Holt PE, Thrusfield MV. Association in bitches between breed, size, neutering and docking, and acquired urinary incontinence due to incompetence of urethral sphincter mechanism. Vet Rec 1993; 133: 177180.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Holt PE. Importance of urethral length, bladder neck position and vestibulovaginal stenosis in sphincter mechanism incompetence in the incontinent bitch. Res Vet Sci 1985; 39: 364372.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Awad SA, Downie JW. Relative contributions of smooth and striated muscles to the canine urethral pressure profile. Br J Urol 1976; 48: 347354.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Raz S, Caine M, Zeigler M. The vascular component in the production of intraurethral pressure. J Urol 1972; 108: 9396.

  • 6

    Andersson KE. Pharmacology of lower urinary tract smooth muscles and penile erectile tissues. Pharmacol Rev 1993; 45: 253308.

  • 7

    Auguet M, Delaflotte S, Chabrier P-E. Different α1-adrenoceptor subtypes mediate contraction in rabbit aorta and urethra. Eur J Pharmacol 1995; 287: 153161.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Modiri A-R, Fredricksony MG, Gillberg PG, et al. Selectivity of oxymetazoline for urethral pressure vs blood pressure in the anaesthetized female rabbit. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2000; 34: 151156.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Hashimoto S, Kigoshi S, Muramatsu I. Neurogenic responses of urethra isolated from the dog. Eur J Pharmacol 1992; 213: 117123.

  • 10

    White RA, Pomeroy CJ. Phenylpropanolamine: an α-adrenergic agent for the management of urinary incontinence in the bitch associated with urethral sphincter mechanism incompetence. Vet Rec 1989; 125: 478480.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Awad SA, Downie JW, Kirulata HG. Pharmacologic treatment of disorders of bladder and urethra: a review. Can J Surg 1979; 22: 515518.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Jorgensen L, Lose G, Alexander N. Acute effect of norfenefrine on the urethral pressure profile in females with genuine stress incontinence. Urol Int 1991; 46: 176179.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Lin H-H, Sheu B-C, Lo M-C, et al. Comparison of treatment outcomes for imipramine for female genuine stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106: 10891092.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Finkbeiner AE, Bissada NK. Drug therapy for lower urinary tract dysfunction. Urol Clin North Am 1980; 7: 316.

  • 15

    Collste L, Lindskog M. Phenylpropanolamine in treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Double-blind placebo controlled study in 24 patients. Urology 1987; 30: 398403.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Awad SA, Downie JW, Kiruluta HG. Alpha-adrenergic agents in urinary disorders of the proximal urethra. Part I. Sphincteric incontinence. Br J Urol 1978; 50: 332335.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Ek A, Andersson KE, Ulmsten U. The effects of norephedrine and bethanechol on the human urethral closure pressure profile. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1978; 12: 97104.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Ek A, Andersson KE, Gullberg B, et al. The effects of long-term treatment with norephedrine on stress incontinence and urethral closure pressure profile. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1978; 12: 105110.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Richter KP, Ling GV. Clinical response and urethral pressure profile changes after phenylpropanolamine in dogs with primary sphincter incompetence. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1985; 187: 605611.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Scott L, Leddy M, Bernay F, et al. Evaluation of phenylpropanolamine in the treatment of urethral sphincter mechanism incompetence in the bitch. J Small Anim Pract 2002; 43: 493496.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Lasagna L. Phenylpropanolamine: a review. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1988.

  • 22

    Hensel P, Binder H, Arnold S. Einfluss von Phenylpropanolamin und Ephedrin auf den urethralen Verschlussdruck und den arteriellen Blutdruck bei kastrierten Hundinnen. Kleintierpraxis 2000; 45: 617628.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Gillberg PG, Fredrickson MG, Ohman BM, et al. The effect of phenylpropanolamine on the urethral pressure and heart rate is retained after repeated short-term administration in the unanaesthetized, conscious dog. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1998; 32: 171176.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Montague DK, Stewart BH. Urethral pressure profiles before and after Ornade administration in patients with stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 1979; 122: 198199.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Haller CA, Benowitz NL. Adverse cardiovascular and central nervous system events associated with dietary supplements containing ephedra alkaloids. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 18331838.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    White LM, Gardner SF, Gurley BJ, et al. Pharmacokinetics and cardiovascular effects of Ma-huang (Ephedra sinica) in normotensive adults. J Clin Pharmacol 1997; 37: 116122.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Haller CA, Jacob P, Benowitz NL. Enhanced stimulant and metabolic effects of combined ephedrine and caffeine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2004; 75: 259273.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Vick J, Weiss L, Ellis S. Cardiovascular studies of phenylpropanolamine. Arch Int Pharmacodyn 1994; 327: 1324.

  • 29

    Khanna OP, Heber D, Gonick P. Cholinergic and adrenergic neuroreceptors in urinary tract of female dogs. Evaluation of function with pharmacodynamics. Urology 1975; 5: 616623.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Raz S, Caine M. Adrenergic receptors in the female canine urethra. Invest Urol 1972; 9: 319323.

  • 31

    Sjogren C, Tobin G. An experimental model for long-term examination of urethral and uterine pressures in conscious dogs: effect of a highly selective compound contracting urethral smooth muscles. J Urol 1995; 153: 201205.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Rosin AH, Ross L. Diagnosis and pharmacological management of disorders of urinary continence in the dog. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1981; 3: 601610.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Krawiec DR, Rubin SI. Urinary incontinence in geriatric dogs. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1985; 7: 557563.

  • 34

    Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996; 1125.

  • 35

    Johnston S, Root Kustritz M, Olson P. Vaginal cytology.. In: Canine and feline theriogenology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 2001; 3240.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36

    Holt PE, Gibbs C, Wathes CM. Simultaneous urethral pressure profilometry using a microtip transducer catheter in the bitch: effects of bitch position and transducer orientation. Neurourol Urodyn 1990; 9: 281296.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37

    Hamaide AJ, Verstegen JP, Snaps FR, et al. Validation and comparison of the use of diuresis cystometry and retrograde filling cystometry at various infusion rates in female Beagle dogs. Am J Vet Res 2003; 64: 574579.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38

    International Continence Society. First report on the standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function. Br J Urol 1976; 48: 3942.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39

    Lentner C. Statistical methods.. In: Introduction to statistics. Basel, Switzerland: Ciba-Geigy, 1982; 182236.

  • 40

    Hussain MA, Aungst BJ, Lam G, et al. Phenylpropanolamine pharmacokinetics in dogs after intravenous, oral, and oral controlled-release doses. Biopharm Drug Dispos 1987; 8: 497505.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41

    Wolters M, Methfessel HD, Goepel C, et al. Computer-assisted virtual urethral pressure profile in the assessment of female genuine stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 6974.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42

    Rao VV, Rambhau D, Rao BR, et al. Pharmacokinetics of a single dose of phenylpropanolamine following oral administration at two different times of the day. Arzneimittelforschung 1998; 48: 10871090.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43

    Scherzinger SS, Dowse R, Kanfer I. Steady state pharmacokinetics and dose-proportionality of phenylpropanolamine in healthy subjects. J Clin Pharmacol 1990; 30: 372377.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44

    Kanfer I, Dowse R, Vuma V. Pharmacokinetics of oral decongestants. Pharmacotherapy 1993; 13: 116S128S.

  • 45

    Thiercelin JF, Jacquot C, Rapin JR, et al. Pharmacokinetics of DL-norephedrine 14C in the rat [in French]. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 1976; 220: 153163.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 46

    Lonnerholm G, Grahnen A, Lindstrom B. Steady-state kinetics of sustained-release phenylpropanolamine. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol 1984; 22: 3941.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 47

    Diokno AC, Taub M. Ephedrine in treatment of urinary incontinence. Urology 1975; 5: 624625.

  • 48

    Fossberg E, Beisland HO, Lundgren RA. Stress incontinence in females: treatment with phenylpropanolamine. A urodynamic and pharmacological evaluation. Urol Int 1983; 38: 293299.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 49

    Kadar N, Nelson JH. Treatment of urinary incontinence after radical hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 64: 400405.

  • 50

    Andersson KE. Current concepts in the treatment of disorders of micturition. Drugs 1988; 35: 477494.

  • 51

    Callahan SM, Creed KE. The effects of estrogens on spontaneous activity and responses to phenylephrine of the mammalian urethra. J Physiol 1985; 358: 3546.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 52

    Collins S, Caron MG, Lefkowitz RJ. Regulation of adrenergic receptor responsiveness through modulation of receptor gene expression. Annu Rev Physiol 1991; 53: 497508.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 53

    Lohse MJ. Molecular mechanisms of membrane receptor desensitization. Biochim Biophys Acta 1993; 1179: 171188.

  • 54

    Toews ML, Shreve PE, Bylund DB. Regulation of adrenergic receptors.. In: Martinez JR, Edwards BS, Seagrave JC, eds. Signalling mechanisms in secretory and immune cells. San Francisco: San Francisco Press, 1991; 117.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 55

    Pickup ME, May CS, Ssendagire R, et al. The pharmacokinetics of ephedrine after oral dosage in asthmatics receiving acute and chronic treatment. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1976; 3: 123134.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 56

    Berlin I, Warot D, Aymard G, et al. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of single nasal (5 mg and 10 mg) and oral (50 mg) doses of ephedrine in healthy subjects. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2001; 57: 447455.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 57

    Csajka C, Haller CA, Benowitz NL, et al. Mechanistic pharmacokinetics modelling of ephedrine, norephedrine and caffeine in healthy subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2005; 59: 335345.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 58

    Augsburger HR, Cruz-Orive LM, Arnold S. Morphology and stereology of the female canine urethra correlated with the urethral pressure profile. Acta Anat (Basel) 1993; 148: 197205.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 59

    Brading AF, McCoy R, Dass N. α1-adrenoceptors in urethral function. Eur Urol 1999; 36(suppl 1): 7479.

  • 60

    Awad SA, Downie JW. The effects of adrenergic drugs and hypogastric nerve stimulation on the canine urethra. A radiologic and urethral pressure study. Invest Urol 1976; 13: 298301.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 61

    Persky AM, Berry NS, Pollack GM, et al. Modelling the cardiovascular effects of ephedrine. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2004; 57: 552562.

  • 62

    Minneman KP, Fox AW, Abel PW. Occupancy of α1-adrenergic receptors and contraction of rat vas deferens. Mol Pharmacol 1983; 23: 359368.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 63

    Persson CGA, Erjefalt I, Keman M. Brompheniramine and the cardio-vascular effects of norephedrine and noradrenaline. Acta Allergol 1973; 28: 401415.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 64

    Stevens MJ, Moulds RF. Heterogeneity of post-junctional α-adrenoceptors in human vascular smooth muscle. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 1981; 254: 4357.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 65

    Stevens MJ, Rittinghausen RE, Moulds RFW. Heterogeneity of human vascular pre- and post-synaptic α-adrenoceptors. Clin Sci (Lond) 1981; 61(suppl 7): 203s206s.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 66

    Blackburn GL, Morgan JP, Lavin PT, et al. Determinants of the pressor effect of phenylpropanolamine in healthy subjects. JAMA 1989; 261: 32673272.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 67

    Kittleson MD, Kienle RD. Syncope.. In: Kittleson MD, Kienle RD, eds. Small animal cardiovascular medicine. St Louis: Mosby Inc, 1998; 495501.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 68

    Claeys MA, Gepts E, Camu F. Haemodynamic changes during anaesthesia induced and maintained with propofol. Br J Anaesth 1988; 60: 39.

  • 69

    Michelsen I, Helbo-Hansen HS, Kohler F, et al. Prophylactic ephedrine attenuates the hemodynamic response to propofol in elderly female patients. Anesth Analg 1998; 86: 477481.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 70

    Nakaigawa Y, Akazawa S, Shimuzu R, et al. Effects of graded infusion rates of propofol on cardiovascular haemodynamics, coronary circulation and myocardial metabolism in dogs. Br J Anaesth 1995; 75: 616621.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement