In vitro evaluation of three bacterial culture systems for the recovery of Escherichia coli from equine blood

Mireia Lorenzo-Figueras Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.

Search for other papers by Mireia Lorenzo-Figueras in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Nicola Pusterla Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.

Search for other papers by Nicola Pusterla in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 Dr Med Vet, Habil
,
Barbara A. Byrne Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.

Search for other papers by Barbara A. Byrne in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
, and
Eileen M. Samitz Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.

Search for other papers by Eileen M. Samitz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MA

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate the effectiveness of a commercial conventional blood culture system (BCS), a commercial resin-containing BCS, and a commercial lysis-centrifugation–based BCS for the recovery of Escherichia coli from equine blood samples inoculated with that organism.

Sample Population—Samples of blood obtained from a clinically normal horse that were inoculated with E coli.

Procedures—Blood samples were aseptically collected and inoculated with an E coli specimen (50 CFUs/mL) that had been previously isolated from a foal with sepsis. Subsequently, samples were spiked with gentamicin at a concentration of 30 μg/mL, and 10 mL of each mixture was inoculated into 1 bottle or tube of each BCS. Samples were processed and incubated according to the manufacturer's guidelines and inoculated onto 5% sheep blood agar plates. Plated samples were examined macroscopically at regular intervals for as long as 72 hours. Detection of E coli and time to detection were recorded for each medium.

Results—Detection frequency of E coli was significantly greater by use of the resin-containing BCS (14/23 bottles) than that achieved by use of the conventional BCS (7/23 bottles) or the lysis-centrifugation–based BCS (0/10 tubes). Mean detection time (6 hours after plating) did not differ between the BCS with conventional medium and the BCS with resincontaining medium.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results suggest that a BCS with resin-containing medium may provide clinical benefit in the successful recovery of E coli from the blood of foals with sepsis that have been previously administered gentamicin.

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate the effectiveness of a commercial conventional blood culture system (BCS), a commercial resin-containing BCS, and a commercial lysis-centrifugation–based BCS for the recovery of Escherichia coli from equine blood samples inoculated with that organism.

Sample Population—Samples of blood obtained from a clinically normal horse that were inoculated with E coli.

Procedures—Blood samples were aseptically collected and inoculated with an E coli specimen (50 CFUs/mL) that had been previously isolated from a foal with sepsis. Subsequently, samples were spiked with gentamicin at a concentration of 30 μg/mL, and 10 mL of each mixture was inoculated into 1 bottle or tube of each BCS. Samples were processed and incubated according to the manufacturer's guidelines and inoculated onto 5% sheep blood agar plates. Plated samples were examined macroscopically at regular intervals for as long as 72 hours. Detection of E coli and time to detection were recorded for each medium.

Results—Detection frequency of E coli was significantly greater by use of the resin-containing BCS (14/23 bottles) than that achieved by use of the conventional BCS (7/23 bottles) or the lysis-centrifugation–based BCS (0/10 tubes). Mean detection time (6 hours after plating) did not differ between the BCS with conventional medium and the BCS with resincontaining medium.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results suggest that a BCS with resin-containing medium may provide clinical benefit in the successful recovery of E coli from the blood of foals with sepsis that have been previously administered gentamicin.

Contributor Notes

Supported by Equine Resident Research Funds from the Center for Equine Health Program of the University of California.

Address correspondence to Dr. Pusterla.
  • 1

    Marsh PS, Palmer JE. Bacterial isolates from blood and their susceptibility patterns in critically ill foals: 543 cases (1991–1998). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001;218:16081610.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Gaur AH, Giannini MA & Flynn PM, et al. Optimizing blood culture practices in pediatric immunocompromised patients: evaluation of media types and blood culture volume. Pediatr Infect Dis 2003;22:545552.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Kellogg JA, Manzella JP, McConville JH. Clinical laboratory comparison of the 10-ml isolator blood cultures system with BACTEC radiometric blood culture media. J Clin Microbiol 1984;20:618623.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Hsu KK, Pelton SI, Shapiro DS. Detection of group B streptococcal bacteremia in simulated intrapartum antimicrobial prophylaxis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2003;45:2327.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Moody JA, Fasching CE & Shanholtzer CJ, et al. Evaluation of new blood culture processing systems. J Clin Microbiol 1984;20:351356.

  • 6

    Spaargaren J, van Boven CPA, Voorn GP. Effectiveness of resins in neutralizing antibiotic activities in bactec plus Aerobic/F culture medium. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36:37313733.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Rohner P, Pepey B, Auckenthaler R. Advantage of combining resin with lytic BACTEC blood culture media. J Clin Microbiol 1997;35:26342638.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Smith SM, Eng RH. In vitro evaluation of the BACTEC resin-containing blood culture bottle. J Clin Microbiol 1983;17:11201126.

  • 9

    Henson S, Barton MH. Bacterial isolates and antibiotic sensitivity patterns from septicemic neonatal foals: a 15 year retrospective study (1986–2000), in Proceedings. Dorothy Havemeyer Foundation Neonatal Workshop III 2001;5052.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Raisis AL, Hodgson JL, Hodgson DR. Equine neonatal septicaemia: 24 cases. Aust Vet J 1996;73:137140.

  • 11

    Wilson WD, Madigan JE. Comparison of bacteriologic culture of blood and necropsy specimens for determining the cause of foal septicaemia: 47 cases (1978–1987). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1989;195:17591763.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Dietzam DE, Fischer GW, Schoenknecht FD. Neonatal Escherichia coli septicaemia-bacterial counts in blood. J Pediatr 1974;85:128130.

  • 13

    McKenzie HC, Furr MO. Aminoglycoside antibiotics in neonatal foals. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 2003;25:457468.

  • 14

    Applebaum PC, Beckwith DG & Diperso JR, et al. Enhanced detection of bacteremia with a new BACTEC resin blood culture medium. J Clin Microbiol 1983;17:4851.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Appleman MD, Swinney RS, Heseltine PNR. Evaluation of the antibiotic removal device. J Clin Microbiol 1982;15:278281.

  • 16

    Courcol RJ, Durocher AV & Roussel-Delvallez M, et al. Routine evaluation of BACTEC NR 16A and NR17A media. J Clin Microbiol 1988;26:16191622.

  • 17

    Doern GV, Gantz NM. Detection of bacteremia in patients receiving antimicrobial removal device and 16B medium. J Clin Microbiol 1983;18:4348.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Eisenach K, Dyke J, Boehme M. Pediatric blood culture evaluation of the BACTEC PEDS Plus and the DuPont Isolator 1.5 systems. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 1992;15:225231.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Hopfer RL, Moore DG & Fainstein S, et al. Routine use of BACTEC 16B bottles to remove antibacterial and antitumor agents from blood of cancer patients. J Clin Microbiol 1983;18:759764.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Kelly MT, Roberts FJ & Henry D, et al. Clinical comparison of Isolator and BACTEC 660 resin media for blood culture. J Clin Microbiol 1990;28:19251927.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Koontz FP, Flint KK & Reynolds JK, et al. Multicenter comparison of the high volume (10 ml) NR BACTEC PLUS system and the standard (5 ml) NR BACTEC system. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 1991;14:111118.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Peterson LR, Shanholtzer ML & Mohn ML, et al. Improved recovery of microorganisms from patients receiving antibiotics with the antimicrobial removal device. Am J Clin Pathol 1983;80:692696.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Pohlman JK, Kirkley BA & Easley KA, et al. Controlled clinical comparison of Isolator and BACTEC 9240 Aerobic/F resin bottle for detection of bloodstream infections. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:25252529.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Strand CL, Hickman A & Bryant JK, et al. Evaluation of the BACTEC resin blood culture medium. Am J Clin Pathol 1983;80:706710.

  • 25

    Tarrand JJ, Guillot C & Wenglar M, et al. Clinical comparison of the resin-containing BACTEC 26 Plus and the Isolator 10 blood culturing systems. J Clin Microbiol 1991;29:22452249.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Tegtmeier BR, Vice JL. Evaluation of the Bactec 16B medium in a cancer center. Am J Clin Pathol 1984;81:783786.

  • 27

    Wallis C, Melnick JL & Wende RD, et al. Rapid isolation of bacteria from septicemic patients by use of an antimicrobial agent removal device. J Clin Microbiol 1980;11:462464.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Lindsey NJ, Riely PE. In vitro antibiotic removal and bacterial recovery from blood with an antibiotic removal device. J Clin Microbiol 1981;13:503507.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Lelievre H, Jiménez M, Vandenesch F. Multicenter clinical comparison of resin-containing bottles for culture of microorganisms from blood. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1997;16:669674.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Weinstein MP, Mirrett S & Wilson ML, et al. Controlled evaluation of BACTEC Plus 26 and Roche Septi-Chek aerobic blood culture bottles. J Clin Microbiol 1991;29:879882.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Kelly MT, Buck GE, Fojtasek MF. Evaluation of a lysis-centrifugation and biphasic bottle blood culture system during routine use. J Clin Microbiol 1983;18:554557.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Henry NK, McLimans CA & Wright AJ, et al. Microbiological and clinical evaluation of the isolator lysis-centrifugation blood culture tube. J Clin Microbiol 1983;17:864869.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Sullivan NM, Sutter VL, Finegold SM. Practical aerobic membrane filtration blood culture technique: clinical blood culture trial. J Clin Microbiol 1975;1:3743.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    Jorgensen JH. Special procedures for performance of blood cultures. In:Smith JW, ed.The role of clinical microbiology in cost-effective health care. Skokie, Ill: College of American Pathologists, 1985;175182.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35

    Smith JA, Bryce EA & Ngui-Yen JH, et al. Comparison of BACTEC 9240 and BacT/Alert blood culture systems in an adult hospital. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:19051908.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36

    Reller LB. Recent and innovative methods for detection of bacteremia and fungemia. Am J Med 1983;75:2630.

  • 37

    Gutierrez J, de la Higuera A, Piedrola G. Automated blood culture systems. Ann Biol Clin 1995;53:2528.

  • 38

    Smith SM, Eng RH. Effectiveness of antibiotic removal by the antibiotic-binding blood culture systems. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 1985;3:201212.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement