• 1

    Behar J. The role of the lower esophageal sphincter in reflux prevention. J Clin Gastroenterol 1986; 8(suppl 1): 24.

  • 2

    Laitinen SMokka REMValanne JVI, et al.Anaesthesia induction and lower oesophageal sphincter pressure. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1978; 22: 1620.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Strombeck DRTurner WDHarrold D. Eructation of gas through the gastroesophageal sphincter before and after gastric fundectomy in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1988; 49: 8789.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Pratschke KMBellenger CRMcAllister H, et al.Barrier pressure at the gastroesophageal junction in anesthetized dogs. Am J Vet Res 2001; 62: 10681072.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Cox MRMartin CJDent J, et al.Effect of general anesthesia on transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations in the dog. Aust N Z J Surg 1988; 58: 825830.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Strombeck DRHarrold D. Effect of atropine, acepromazine, meperidine, and xylazine on gastroesophageal sphincter pressure in the dog. Am J Vet Res 1985; 46: 963965.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Hashim MAWaterman AE. Effects of acepromazine, pethidine and atropine premedication on lower oesophageal sphincter pressure and barrier pressure in anaesthetized cats. Vet Rec 1993; 133: 158160.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Hashim MAWaterman AEPearson H. A comparison of the effects of halothane and isoflurane in combination with nitrous oxide on lower oesophageal sphincter pressure and barrier pressure in anaesthetized dogs. Vet Rec 1995; 137: 658661.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Hall AWMoossa ARClark J, et al.The effects of premedication drugs on the lower oesophageal high pressure zone and reflux status of Rhesus monkeys and man. Gut 1975; 16: 347352.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Hagberg CAVartazarian TNChelly JE, et al.The incidence of gastroesophageal reflux and tracheal aspiration detected with pH electrodes is similar with the Laryngeal Mask Airway and Esophageal Tracheal Combitube—a pilot study. Can J Anaesth 2004; 51: 243249.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Verghese CBrimacombe JR. Survey of laryngeal mask airway usage in 11,910 patients: safety and efficacy for conventional and nonconventional usage. Anesth Analg 1996; 82: 129133.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Pearson HDarke PGGGibbs C, et al.Reflux oesophagitis and stricture formation after anaesthesia: a review of seven cases in dogs and cats. J Small Anim Pract 1978; 19: 507519.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Wilson DVWalshaw R. Postanesthetic esophageal dysfunction in 13 dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2004; 40: 455460.

  • 14

    Stoelting RK. Gastric fluid volume and pH after fentanyl, enflurane, or halothane-nitrous oxide anesthesia with or without atropine or glycopyrrolate. Anesth Analg 1980; 59: 287290.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Foulkes EJenkins LC. A comparative evaluation of cimetidine and sodium citrate to decrease gastric acidity: effectiveness at the time of induction of anaesthesia. Can Anaesth Soc J 1981; 28: 2932.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Martin CAuffray JPRagni J, et al.Measurement of lower oesophageal pH during induction of anesthesia: use of oesophageal probe. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1992; 36: 226229.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Galatos ADRaptopoulos D. Gastro-oesophageal reflux during anaesthesia in the dog: the effect of age, positioning and type of surgical procedure. Vet Rec 1995; 137: 513516.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Wilson DVEvans ATMillar R. Effects of preanesthetic administration of morphine on gastroesophageal reflux and regurgitation during anesthesia in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2005; 66: 386390.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Hall JAWashabau RJ. Gastrointestinal prokinetic therapy: dopaminergic antagonist drugs. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1997; 19: 214220.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Heitman PMoller N. The effect of metoclopramide on the gastroesophageal junction zone and the distal esophagus in man. Scand J Gastroenterol 1970; 5: 621625.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Stanciu CBennett JR. Metoclopramide in gastroesophageal reflux. Gut 1973; 14: 275279.

  • 22

    Pocock S. The combination of randomized and historical controls in clinical trials. J Chronic Dis 1976; 29: 175188.

  • 23

    Waterman AEHashim MA. Measurement of the length and position of the lower oesophageal sphincter by correlation of external measurements and radiographic estimations in dogs. Vet Rec 1991; 129: 261264.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Carneiro AV. Measures of association in clinical trials: definition and interpretation. Rev Port Cardiol 2003; 22: 13931401.

  • 25

    Bischoff-Ferrari HADawson-Hughes BWillett WC, et al.Effect of vitamin D on falls: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2004; 291: 19992006.

  • 26

    Duhmke RCornblath DHollingshead J. Tramadol for neuropathic pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; 2: CD003726.

  • 27

    Cook RJSackett DL. The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect. Br Med J 1995; 310: 452454.

  • 28

    Hess DR. What is evidence-based medicine and why should I care? Respir Care 2004; 49: 730741.

  • 29

    Cotton BRSmith G. Single and combined effects of atropine and metoclopramide on the lower oesophageal sphincter pressure. Br J Anaesth 1981; 53: 869874.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Fowler PJNelson AHPrice WJ, et al.Effects of KC 2450 on the lower esophageal sphincter in vivo and in vitro. Eur J Pharmacol 1987; 142: 225233.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Strombeck DRHarrold D. Effect of gastrin, histamine, serotonin, and adrenergic amines on gastroesophageal sphincter pressure in the dog. Am J Vet Res 1985; 46: 16841690.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Punto LMokka REMKairaluoma MI, et al.Effect of metoclopramide on the lower oesophageal sphincter. An experimental study in dogs. Med Biol 1977; 55: 6668.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Orihata MSarna SK. Contractile mechanisms of action of gastroprokinetic agents: cisapride, metoclopramide, and domperidone. Am J Physiol 1994; 266: G665G676.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    Mangel AWStavorski JRPendleton RG. Effects of bethanechol, metoclopramide, and domperidone on antral contractions in cats and dogs. Digestion 1983; 28: 205209.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35

    Bakke OMSegura J. The absorption and elimination of metoclopramide in three animal species. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 1976; 28: 3239.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36

    Albibi RMcCallum RW. Metoclopramide: pharmacology and clinical application. Ann Intern Med 1983; 98: 8695.

  • 37

    McLauchlan GRawlings JMLucas ML, et al.Electrodes for 24 hour pH monitoring—a comparative study. Gut 1987; 28: 935939.

  • 38

    Murphy DWFaust KBChiantella VM, et al.Assessment of accuracy of intraesophageal pH probe in a dog model. Dig Dis Sci 1989; 34: 10791084.

  • 39

    Murphy DWYuan YCastell DO. Does the intraesophageal pH probe accurately detect acid reflux? Simultaneous recording with two pH probes in humans. Dig Dis Sci 1989; 34: 649656.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40

    Raptopoulos DGalatos AD. Gastro-oesophageal reflux during anaesthesia induced with either thiopentone or propofol in the dog. J Vet Anaesth 1997; 24: 2022.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement

Influence of metoclopramide on gastroesophageal reflux in anesthetized dogs

Deborah V. WilsonDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.

Search for other papers by Deborah V. Wilson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVSc, MS
,
A. Tom EvansDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.

Search for other papers by A. Tom Evans in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS
, and
Whitney A. MauerDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.

Search for other papers by Whitney A. Mauer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
View More View Less

Abstract

Objective—To determine the effect of 2 doses of metoclopramide on the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in anesthetized dogs.

Animals—52 healthy dogs undergoing elective orthopedic surgery.

Procedure—In this prospective clinical study, dogs were evaluated before and during orthopedic surgery. The anesthetic protocol used was standardized to include administration of acepromazine, morphine, thiopental, and isoflurane. Dogs were randomly selected to receive an infusion of saline (0.9% NaCl) solution, a low dose of metoclopramide, or a high dose of metoclopramide before and during anesthesia. Treatment groups were similar with respect to age, body weight, duration of food withholding before surgery, duration of surgery, and dose of thiopental administered. Dogs were positioned in dorsal recumbency during surgery. A sensor-tipped catheter was inserted to measure esophageal pH during anesthesia. We defined GER as a decrease in esophageal pH to < 4 or an increase to > 7.5 that lasted more than 30 seconds.

Results—The high dose of metoclopramide (bolus loading dose of 1.0 mg/kg, IV, followed by continuous infusion at a rate of 1.0 mg/kg/h) was associated with a 54% reduction in relative risk of developing GER. The low dose did not significantly affect the incidence of GER.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Administration of metoclopramide by bolus and constant rate infusion at doses much higher than commonly used will reduce the incidence but not totally prevent GER in anesthetized dogs undergoing orthopedic surgery.

Abstract

Objective—To determine the effect of 2 doses of metoclopramide on the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in anesthetized dogs.

Animals—52 healthy dogs undergoing elective orthopedic surgery.

Procedure—In this prospective clinical study, dogs were evaluated before and during orthopedic surgery. The anesthetic protocol used was standardized to include administration of acepromazine, morphine, thiopental, and isoflurane. Dogs were randomly selected to receive an infusion of saline (0.9% NaCl) solution, a low dose of metoclopramide, or a high dose of metoclopramide before and during anesthesia. Treatment groups were similar with respect to age, body weight, duration of food withholding before surgery, duration of surgery, and dose of thiopental administered. Dogs were positioned in dorsal recumbency during surgery. A sensor-tipped catheter was inserted to measure esophageal pH during anesthesia. We defined GER as a decrease in esophageal pH to < 4 or an increase to > 7.5 that lasted more than 30 seconds.

Results—The high dose of metoclopramide (bolus loading dose of 1.0 mg/kg, IV, followed by continuous infusion at a rate of 1.0 mg/kg/h) was associated with a 54% reduction in relative risk of developing GER. The low dose did not significantly affect the incidence of GER.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Administration of metoclopramide by bolus and constant rate infusion at doses much higher than commonly used will reduce the incidence but not totally prevent GER in anesthetized dogs undergoing orthopedic surgery.

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to Dr. Wilson.

Supported by a grant from the Michigan State University College of Veterinary Medicine Companion Animal Fund.

Presented in part at the 8th World Congress of Veterinary Anesthesia, Knoxville, Tenn, September 2003.

The authors thank Michelle Granzow and Drs. Bidwell, Bohart, Braden, DeCamp, DeJardin, Flo, Hayashi, and Probst for technical assistance.