Distribution of power across the hind limb joints in Labrador Retrievers and Greyhounds

G. Robert Colborne Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medical and Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Langford, North Somerset, UK, BS40 5DU.

Search for other papers by G. Robert Colborne in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
John F. Innes Small Animal Hospital, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK, L7 7EX.

Search for other papers by John F. Innes in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVSc, PhD
,
Eithne J. Comerford Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, Faculty of Medical and Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Langford, North Somerset, UK, BS40 5DU.

Search for other papers by Eithne J. Comerford in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MVB, PhD
,
Martin R. Owen Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, Faculty of Medical and Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Langford, North Somerset, UK, BS40 5DU.

Search for other papers by Martin R. Owen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVSc, PhD
, and
Cathy J. Fuller Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medical and Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Langford, North Somerset, UK, BS40 5DU.

Search for other papers by Cathy J. Fuller in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVSc, PhD

Abstract

Objective—To quantify angular excursions; net joint moments; and powers across the stifle, tarsal, and metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints in Labrador Retrievers and Greyhounds and investigate differences in joint mechanics between these 2 breeds of dogs.

Animals—12 clinically normal dogs (6 Greyhounds and 6 Labrador Retrievers) with no history of hind limb lameness.

Procedure—Small retroreflective markers were applied to the skin over the pelvic limb joints, and a 4- camera kinematic system captured data at 200 Hz in tandem with force platform data while the dogs trotted on a runway. Breed-specific morphometric data were combined with kinematic and force data in an inverse-dynamics solution for stance-phase net joint moments and powers at the stifle, tarsal, and MTP joints.

Results—There were gross differences in kinematic patterns between Greyhounds and Labradors. At the stifle and tarsal joints, moment and power patterns were similar in shape, but amplitudes were larger for the Greyhounds. The MTP joint was a net absorber of energy, and this was greater in the Greyhounds. Greyhounds had a positive phase across the stifle, tarsal, and MTP joints at the end of stance for an active push-off, whereas for the Labrador Retrievers, the only positive phase was across the tarsus, and this was small, compared with values for the Greyhounds.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Gross differences in pelvic limb mechanics are evident between Greyhounds and Labrador Retrievers. Joint kinetics in specific dogs should be compared against breed-specific patterns. (Am J Vet Res 2005;66:1563–1571)

Abstract

Objective—To quantify angular excursions; net joint moments; and powers across the stifle, tarsal, and metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints in Labrador Retrievers and Greyhounds and investigate differences in joint mechanics between these 2 breeds of dogs.

Animals—12 clinically normal dogs (6 Greyhounds and 6 Labrador Retrievers) with no history of hind limb lameness.

Procedure—Small retroreflective markers were applied to the skin over the pelvic limb joints, and a 4- camera kinematic system captured data at 200 Hz in tandem with force platform data while the dogs trotted on a runway. Breed-specific morphometric data were combined with kinematic and force data in an inverse-dynamics solution for stance-phase net joint moments and powers at the stifle, tarsal, and MTP joints.

Results—There were gross differences in kinematic patterns between Greyhounds and Labradors. At the stifle and tarsal joints, moment and power patterns were similar in shape, but amplitudes were larger for the Greyhounds. The MTP joint was a net absorber of energy, and this was greater in the Greyhounds. Greyhounds had a positive phase across the stifle, tarsal, and MTP joints at the end of stance for an active push-off, whereas for the Labrador Retrievers, the only positive phase was across the tarsus, and this was small, compared with values for the Greyhounds.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Gross differences in pelvic limb mechanics are evident between Greyhounds and Labrador Retrievers. Joint kinetics in specific dogs should be compared against breed-specific patterns. (Am J Vet Res 2005;66:1563–1571)

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 88 0 0
Full Text Views 2890 2572 483
PDF Downloads 428 192 13
Advertisement