Retention of ingested porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in houseflies

Jennifer A. Schurrer Swine Disease Eradication Center, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108.

Search for other papers by Jennifer A. Schurrer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BA
,
Scott A. Dee Swine Disease Eradication Center, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108.

Search for other papers by Scott A. Dee in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Roger D. Moon College of Veterinary Medicine, and the Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture, Food and Environmental Science, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108.

Search for other papers by Roger D. Moon in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Michael P. Murtaugh Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108.

Search for other papers by Michael P. Murtaugh in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Colleen P. Finnegan Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108.

Search for other papers by Colleen P. Finnegan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
,
John Deen Swine Disease Eradication Center, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108.

Search for other papers by John Deen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Steven B. Kleiboeker Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211.

Search for other papers by Steven B. Kleiboeker in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
, and
Carlos B. J. Pijoan Swine Disease Eradication Center, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108.

Search for other papers by Carlos B. J. Pijoan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate retention of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) in houseflies for various time frames and temperatures.

Sample Population—Fifteen 2-week-old pigs, two 10-week-old pigs, and laboratory-cultivated houseflies.

Procedure—In an initial experiment, houseflies were exposed to PRRSV; housed at 15°, 20°, 25°, and 30°C; and tested at various time points. In a second experiment to determine dynamics of virus retention, houseflies were exposed to PRRSV and housed under controlled field conditions for 48 hours. Changes in the percentage of PRRSV-positive flies and virus load per fly were assessed over time, and detection of infective virus at 48 hours after exposure was measured. Finally, in a third experiment, virus loads were measured in houseflies allowed to feed on blood, oropharyngeal washings, and nasal washings obtained from experimentally infected pigs.

Results—In experiment 1, PRRSV retention in houseflies was proportional to temperature. In the second experiment, the percentage of PRRSV-positive houseflies and virus load per fly decreased over time; however, infective PRRSV was found in houseflies 48 hours after exposure. In experiment 3, PRRSV was detected in houseflies allowed to feed on all 3 porcine body fluids.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—For the conditions of this study, houseflies did not support PRRSV replication. Therefore, retention of PRRSV in houseflies appears to be a function of initial virus load after ingestion and environmental temperature. These factors may impact the risk of insect-borne spread of PRRSV among farms. (Am J Vet Res 2005;66:1517–1525)

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate retention of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) in houseflies for various time frames and temperatures.

Sample Population—Fifteen 2-week-old pigs, two 10-week-old pigs, and laboratory-cultivated houseflies.

Procedure—In an initial experiment, houseflies were exposed to PRRSV; housed at 15°, 20°, 25°, and 30°C; and tested at various time points. In a second experiment to determine dynamics of virus retention, houseflies were exposed to PRRSV and housed under controlled field conditions for 48 hours. Changes in the percentage of PRRSV-positive flies and virus load per fly were assessed over time, and detection of infective virus at 48 hours after exposure was measured. Finally, in a third experiment, virus loads were measured in houseflies allowed to feed on blood, oropharyngeal washings, and nasal washings obtained from experimentally infected pigs.

Results—In experiment 1, PRRSV retention in houseflies was proportional to temperature. In the second experiment, the percentage of PRRSV-positive houseflies and virus load per fly decreased over time; however, infective PRRSV was found in houseflies 48 hours after exposure. In experiment 3, PRRSV was detected in houseflies allowed to feed on all 3 porcine body fluids.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—For the conditions of this study, houseflies did not support PRRSV replication. Therefore, retention of PRRSV in houseflies appears to be a function of initial virus load after ingestion and environmental temperature. These factors may impact the risk of insect-borne spread of PRRSV among farms. (Am J Vet Res 2005;66:1517–1525)

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 34 0 0
Full Text Views 2065 1902 494
PDF Downloads 195 121 2
Advertisement