Use of serologic evaluation for antibodies against bovine viral diarrhea virus for detection of persistently infected calves in beef herds

Cheryl L. Waldner Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5B4, Canada.

Search for other papers by Cheryl L. Waldner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
and
John R. Campbell Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5B4, Canada.

Search for other papers by John R. Campbell in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, DVSc

Abstract

Objective—To determine whether use of serologic evaluation of a sentinel sample of calves or cows for antibodies against bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) would accurately predict whether an animal persistently infected with BVDV could be detected in beef herds.

Sample Population—27 cow-calf herds in which the status of persistently infected calves was not known and 11 herds known to have persistently infected calves.

Procedure—Detection of persistently infected calves was determined through immunohistochemical testing of tissue obtained at necropsy of all calves that died during calving season and skin (ear notch) specimens obtained from all young stock in the fall of 2002. Serum samples were collected from 30 springborn calves and 10 mature cows.

Results—Optimum serologic test performance at time of weaning was detected when 10 calves were evaluated. At least 3 of 10 randomly selected calves were likely to have a titer > 1:1,000 against BVDV type I or II in 53% of herds in which a persistently infected calf was detected during that year (sensitivity, 53%). However, at least 3 of 10 randomly selected calves were also likely to have a titer > 1:1,000 in 20% of herds that did not have a persistently infected calf detected during that year (specificity, 80%).

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Despite the use of a number of various cutoff values and sample sizes, serologic evaluation of a small number of calves or cows could not be used to accurately predict the presence of persistently infected cattle in a herd. (Am J Vet Res 2005;66:825–834)

Abstract

Objective—To determine whether use of serologic evaluation of a sentinel sample of calves or cows for antibodies against bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) would accurately predict whether an animal persistently infected with BVDV could be detected in beef herds.

Sample Population—27 cow-calf herds in which the status of persistently infected calves was not known and 11 herds known to have persistently infected calves.

Procedure—Detection of persistently infected calves was determined through immunohistochemical testing of tissue obtained at necropsy of all calves that died during calving season and skin (ear notch) specimens obtained from all young stock in the fall of 2002. Serum samples were collected from 30 springborn calves and 10 mature cows.

Results—Optimum serologic test performance at time of weaning was detected when 10 calves were evaluated. At least 3 of 10 randomly selected calves were likely to have a titer > 1:1,000 against BVDV type I or II in 53% of herds in which a persistently infected calf was detected during that year (sensitivity, 53%). However, at least 3 of 10 randomly selected calves were also likely to have a titer > 1:1,000 in 20% of herds that did not have a persistently infected calf detected during that year (specificity, 80%).

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Despite the use of a number of various cutoff values and sample sizes, serologic evaluation of a small number of calves or cows could not be used to accurately predict the presence of persistently infected cattle in a herd. (Am J Vet Res 2005;66:825–834)

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 24 0 0
Full Text Views 1445 1328 40
PDF Downloads 115 68 2
Advertisement