Evaluation of an in-shoe pressure measurement system in horses

Carter E. Judy Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital College of Letters and Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616-8747.

Search for other papers by Carter E. Judy in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Larry D. Galuppo Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences College of Letters and Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616-8747.

Search for other papers by Larry D. Galuppo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Jack R. Snyder Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences College of Letters and Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616-8747.

Search for other papers by Jack R. Snyder in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
, and
Neil H. Willits School of Veterinary Medicine, and the Division of Statistics College of Letters and Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616-8747.

Search for other papers by Neil H. Willits in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD

Abstract

Objective—To develop an objective, accurate method for quantifying forelimb ground reaction forces in horses by adapting a human in-shoe pressure measurement system and determine the reliability of the system for shod and unshod horses.

Animals—6 adult Thoroughbreds.

Procedure—Horses were instrumented with a human in-shoe pressure measurement system and evaluated at a trot (3 m/s) on a motorized treadmill. Maximum force, stance time, and peak contact area were evaluated for shod and unshod horses. Three trials were performed for shod and unshod horses, and differences in the measured values were examined with a mixed model ANOVA for repeated measures. Sensor accuracy was evaluated by correlating measured variables to clinically observed lameness and by a variance component analysis.

Results—4 of 6 horses were determined to be lame in a forelimb on the basis of clinical examination and measured values from the system. No significant differences were observed between shod and unshod horses for maximum force and stance time. A significant decrease in peak contact area was observed for shod and unshod horses at each successive trial. Maximum force measurements provided the highest correlation for detecting lameness ( r = 0.91, shod horses; r = 1.0, unshod horses). A variance component analysis revealed that 3 trials provided a variance of 35.35 kg for maximum force (± 5.78% accuracy), 0.007 seconds for stance time (± 2.5% accuracy), and 8.58 cm2 for peak contact area (± 11.95% accuracy).

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—The in-shoe pressure measurement system provides an accurate, objective, and effective method to evaluate lameness in horses. ( Am J Vet Res 2001;62:23–28)

Abstract

Objective—To develop an objective, accurate method for quantifying forelimb ground reaction forces in horses by adapting a human in-shoe pressure measurement system and determine the reliability of the system for shod and unshod horses.

Animals—6 adult Thoroughbreds.

Procedure—Horses were instrumented with a human in-shoe pressure measurement system and evaluated at a trot (3 m/s) on a motorized treadmill. Maximum force, stance time, and peak contact area were evaluated for shod and unshod horses. Three trials were performed for shod and unshod horses, and differences in the measured values were examined with a mixed model ANOVA for repeated measures. Sensor accuracy was evaluated by correlating measured variables to clinically observed lameness and by a variance component analysis.

Results—4 of 6 horses were determined to be lame in a forelimb on the basis of clinical examination and measured values from the system. No significant differences were observed between shod and unshod horses for maximum force and stance time. A significant decrease in peak contact area was observed for shod and unshod horses at each successive trial. Maximum force measurements provided the highest correlation for detecting lameness ( r = 0.91, shod horses; r = 1.0, unshod horses). A variance component analysis revealed that 3 trials provided a variance of 35.35 kg for maximum force (± 5.78% accuracy), 0.007 seconds for stance time (± 2.5% accuracy), and 8.58 cm2 for peak contact area (± 11.95% accuracy).

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—The in-shoe pressure measurement system provides an accurate, objective, and effective method to evaluate lameness in horses. ( Am J Vet Res 2001;62:23–28)

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 37 0 0
Full Text Views 1444 1264 356
PDF Downloads 150 75 5
Advertisement